Back to Browse

Committee Releases MCP Server

Developer ToolsLow Risk10.0MCP RegistryRemote
Free

Server data from the Official MCP Registry

Committee Releases — documents congressional committees publish on their OWN

About

Committee Releases — documents congressional committees publish on their OWN

Remote endpoints: streamable-http: https://gateway.pipeworx.io/committee-releases/mcp

Security Report

10.0
Low Risk10.0Low Risk

Valid MCP server (1 strong, 0 medium validity signals). No known CVEs in dependencies. Imported from the Official MCP Registry. Trust signals: trusted author (1291/1304 approved). 1 finding(s) downgraded by scanner intelligence.

34 tools verified · Open access · 1 issue found

Security scores are indicators to help you make informed decisions, not guarantees. Always review permissions before connecting any MCP server.

Permissions Required

This plugin requests these system permissions. Most are normal for its category.

HTTP Network Access

Connects to external APIs or services over the internet.

How to Connect

Remote Plugin

No local installation needed. Your AI client connects to the remote endpoint directly.

Add this to your MCP configuration to connect:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "io-github-pipeworx-io-committee-releases": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/committee-releases/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Documentation

View on GitHub

From the project's GitHub README.

@pipeworx/committee-releases

Documents congressional committees publish on their own websites — press releases, oversight letters, staff reports, released interview transcripts and investigation files. Keyless.

Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1476+ live data sources.

Tools

  • search_committee_documents(...) — find documents by headline across seven committees, filtered by committee, doc_type and (where dates exist) since.
  • get_committee_document(...) — a document page's headline, publication date, published text and attached PDFs with URLs and sizes.
  • list_committee_document_types(...) — which committees are covered and what each publishes.

Auth

None.

Why this exists

congressional-documents covers GovInfo — the official printed record, which lags the event by months and never receives the ad-hoc material a committee posts to its own site. This covers that gap, within hours of publication.

Committees covered

CommitteeChamberShapeDates
house-oversightHousetypedyes
hsgacSenatetypedyes
senate-commerceSenatetypedyes
senate-judiciarySenateflatno
senate-foreign-relationsSenateflatno
senate-helpSenateflatno
senate-agingSenateflatno

~40,600 documents indexed. All 30 major House and Senate committees were surveyed on 2026-07-30: most House committees publish no sitemap at all, so they cannot be added without a new adapter.

flat committees publish a sitemap with no dates. Their results carry last_updated: null, sort alphabetically rather than by recency, and refuse since instead of applying it to undated rows — which would return pre-cutoff documents as though they had passed the filter. The response says so via dates_unavailable.

Not every committee publishes every type. A doc_type a committee does not publish returns an explicit unavailable_types and a note, never an empty list that would read as "nothing on the subject".

Coverage and limits

  • Search matches the document headline/slug, not body or PDF text. Searching 40,000 pages of body text needs full-text indexing. A null result means no headline matched — not that the subject is absent.
  • PDF text is not extracted. Attachments come back as url + filename + bytes. Quote the page text and cite the attachment as a link; do not represent a PDF as having been read.
  • Some pages are pure file wrappers with no prose of their own; those return empty text plus a no_prose_note rather than the site footer.
  • get_committee_document fetches a caller-supplied URL, so it is host-allowlisted to the seven committee domains.

A deliberate omission

No person→mentions tool, for the reasons set out in congressional-documents: a name is not an identifier, and being named in a committee document is not an allegation.

Data sources

Each committee's Yoast sitemap index or sitemap.xml, e.g.:

  • https://oversight.house.gov/sitemap_index.xml
  • https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/sitemap_index.xml
  • https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/sitemap.xml

All are served under a robots.txt with an empty Disallow: — crawling explicitly permitted.

Quick Start

Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "committee-releases": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/committee-releases/mcp"
    }
  }
}

What this endpoint actually serves

tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/committee-releases/mcp returns the tools in the table above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-toolsask_pipeworx, discover_tools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and is the authoritative answer for a given day.

This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth, connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.

Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pipeworx": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1476+ data sources. The only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx reaches all of them from either one.

Using with ask_pipeworx

Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:

ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Committee Releases data" })

The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.

More

License

MIT

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first to review this server!