Server data from the Official MCP Registry
9-LLM consensus + disagreement scoring + cheapest-route picks to fight hallucinations.
About
9-LLM consensus + disagreement scoring + cheapest-route picks to fight hallucinations.
Security Report
OpenClaw Consensus MCP is a well-structured server that calls an external RapidAPI endpoint to provide multi-LLM consensus answers. Authentication is properly handled via environment variables (RAPIDAPI_KEY), input validation is present for mode and quality parameters, and there are no apparent malicious patterns or credential leaks. Minor code quality observations exist but do not present security risks. Package verification found 1 issue (1 critical, 0 high severity).
6 files analyzed · 5 issues found
Security scores are indicators to help you make informed decisions, not guarantees. Always review permissions before connecting any MCP server.
Permissions Required
This plugin requests these system permissions. Most are normal for its category.
What You'll Need
Set these up before or after installing:
Environment variable: RAPIDAPI_KEY
How to Install
Add this to your MCP configuration file:
{
"mcpServers": {
"io-github-miconnm-openclaw-consensus-mcp": {
"env": {
"RAPIDAPI_KEY": "your-rapidapi-key-here"
},
"args": [
"openclaw-consensus-mcp"
],
"command": "uvx"
}
}
}Documentation
View on GitHubFrom the project's GitHub README.
OpenClaw Consensus MCP
Multi-model consensus inside MCP clients: compare answers, surface disagreement, and escalate only when needed.
OpenClaw Consensus MCP wraps the OpenClaw Consensus API as three Model Context Protocol tools. It is designed for workflows where a maintainer wants a second opinion before accepting a risky answer, review summary, or routing decision.
What it does
OpenClaw runs the same prompt across multiple models, then returns:
- a consensus answer with confidence and model response metadata,
- a disagreement heuristic derived from the deep consensus response, and
- a cheapest route recommendation that tries smaller model sets before escalating.
This MCP server exposes those three capabilities as tools so Claude Desktop / Claude Code can call them mid-conversation.
Why consensus?
A single model can produce a confident but incorrect answer. Comparing multiple responses does not prove correctness, but disagreement is a useful signal that a maintainer should review the output more carefully.
Install
pip install openclaw-consensus-mcp
# or
uv pip install openclaw-consensus-mcp
You also need a RapidAPI key for the OpenClaw Consensus API: https://rapidapi.com/yanmiayn/api/openclaw-consensus
Set it in your environment:
export RAPIDAPI_KEY="your-rapidapi-key"
Claude Desktop config
Add to ~/.claude/claude_desktop_config.json (macOS/Linux) or
%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json (Windows):
{
"mcpServers": {
"openclaw-consensus": {
"command": "openclaw-consensus",
"env": {
"RAPIDAPI_KEY": "your-rapidapi-key"
}
}
}
}
For Claude Code:
claude mcp add openclaw-consensus -- openclaw-consensus
Tools
consensus(prompt, mode="balanced")
Get a 9-LLM consensus answer.
- prompt (string) — the question.
- mode (string, default
balanced) —deep(9 models),balanced(5), orfast(3).
Returns
{
"consensus": "string",
"confidence": 0.0,
"models_responded": 5,
"votes": []
}
The consensus tool returns the upstream API response as-is. Fields may expand as the endpoint evolves.
disagreement_score(prompt)
How much the deep consensus response disagrees on a prompt.
Returns
{
"disagreement": 0.0,
"confidence": 1.0,
"models_responded": 9,
"votes": []
}
cheapest_route(prompt, target_quality=0.85)
Try fast, balanced, and deep modes in order until the confidence threshold is met.
Returns
{
"selected_mode": "balanced",
"models_used": 5,
"confidence": 0.9,
"answer": "string"
}
Local development
git clone https://github.com/MICONNM/openclaw-consensus-mcp
cd openclaw-consensus-mcp
uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest
Smoke-test the server with the official MCP Inspector:
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector openclaw-consensus
Publish
uv build
uv publish # to PyPI
mcp-publisher publish # to the official MCP Registry
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the development workflow and docs/maintainer-workflow.md for triage, review, security, and release responsibilities.
Limitations
- Consensus is a review aid, not a correctness guarantee.
- Network-backed tools require a configured OpenClaw endpoint and may incur provider charges.
- Do not send secrets, private source code, or personal data unless your endpoint policy explicitly allows it.
Security
Please report vulnerabilities privately using the process in SECURITY.md.
License
MIT — see LICENSE.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to review this server!
More Developer Tools MCP Servers
Git
Freeby Modelcontextprotocol · Developer Tools
Read, search, and manipulate Git repositories programmatically
Fetch
Freeby Modelcontextprotocol · Developer Tools
Web content fetching and conversion for efficient LLM usage
Toleno
Freeby Toleno · Developer Tools
Toleno Network MCP Server — Manage your Toleno mining account with Claude AI using natural language.
mcp-creator-python
Freeby mcp-marketplace · Developer Tools
Create, build, and publish Python MCP servers to PyPI — conversationally.
MCP Marketplace
Freeby mcp-marketplace · Developer Tools
Search and install MCP servers from inside your AI client.
MarkItDown
Freeby Microsoft · Content & Media
Convert files (PDF, Word, Excel, images, audio) to Markdown for LLM consumption