Server data from the Official MCP Registry
Attention report for your open GitHub PRs: what needs you right now.
About
Attention report for your open GitHub PRs: what needs you right now.
Security Report
Valid MCP server (2 strong, 4 medium validity signals). 4 known CVEs in dependencies (0 critical, 2 high severity) Package registry verified. Imported from the Official MCP Registry.
8 files analyzed · 5 issues found
Security scores are indicators to help you make informed decisions, not guarantees. Always review permissions before connecting any MCP server.
Permissions Required
This plugin requests these system permissions. Most are normal for its category.
How to Install
Add this to your MCP configuration file:
{
"mcpServers": {
"io-github-cloudcorprecords-prwatch": {
"args": [
"-y",
"@reneturcios/prwatch"
],
"command": "npx"
}
}
}Documentation
View on GitHubFrom the project's GitHub README.
prwatch
What needs your attention right now? prwatch answers that question for contributors with open PRs.
It was born from a real day: three PRs open in one repo, CodeRabbit reviews on all three, a Vercel deploy failure that was not the author's fault, and no way to see at a glance which PR actually needed work. Manually reading every review thread on every PR is the old way. prwatch ranks your open PRs by urgency with human readable reasons, so you open the right one first.
Quickstart
npx @reneturcios/prwatch attention
Install
Requirements: Node 20+.
npx @reneturcios/prwatch attention
Or install it globally:
npm install -g @reneturcios/prwatch
Set GITHUB_TOKEN (or GH_TOKEN) for the 5000 req/hr authenticated rate limit. Without a token it works at the 60 req/hr unauthenticated rate.
Run it with Docker
prwatch also ships as a container image on GHCR: ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/prwatch.
Use it as a stdio MCP server:
docker run -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/prwatch
Any CLI command can be passed after the image name instead of the default mcp argument:
docker run ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/prwatch <command> [args]
Authentication
A token is optional. --repo mode and prwatch show work without one, since they never touch the search API. Account-wide reports (attention / list without --repo) use author: search, which GitHub restricts for unauthenticated callers on some accounts, so a token is recommended there. A classic token with no scopes is enough for public data; without one you get clear guidance instead of a raw 422.
CLI usage
prwatch attention # rank my open PRs by urgency
prwatch attention --user octocat --repo shadcn-labs/pdfcn
prwatch attention --json # machine readable output
prwatch list # simple one line per PR
prwatch show https://github.com/shadcn-labs/pdfcn/pull/92
Example output:
[ACTION] 74 shadcn-labs/pdfcn#92
feat: add Business Letter block
- 4 unresolved review threads need a reply or code change (business-letter.tsx, business-letter.mdx)
https://github.com/shadcn-labs/pdfcn/pull/92
[READY] 45 shadcn-labs/pdfcn#93
feat: add Resume block
- Approved and green, ready to merge.
https://github.com/shadcn-labs/pdfcn/pull/93
prwatch show gives the deep dive: review state, every check with its conclusion, unresolved review threads with file and line, and the full attention breakdown.
MCP server
Same engine as the CLI, exposed over stdio for Claude, Cursor, and Cline:
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
attention_report({user?, repo?}) | Ranked attention report with scores, categories, and reasons |
list_my_prs({user?, repo?}) | Simple list of open PRs |
pr_status({url}) | Deep dive on one PR: reviews, checks, threads, attention score |
Claude Code / Cursor config (~/.claude.json or MCP settings):
{
"mcpServers": {
"prwatch": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/prwatch/dist/mcp.js"],
"env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "ghp_your_token_here" }
}
}
}
Start it directly with npm run start:mcp.
How scoring works
Every open PR starts at 50 points and gains or loses urgency from signals:
| Signal | Effect |
|---|---|
| Changes requested by a reviewer | +30, category ACTION |
| Merge conflict (unmergeable branch) | +25, category ACTION |
| Failing check on your code (build, test, lint, DCO) | +12 each, category ACTION |
| Unresolved review thread that asks for a change | +8 each, category ACTION |
| Approved, checks green, mergeable | READY, score capped at 45 |
| Failing check that is not your fault (for example Vercel "Authorization required to deploy") | classified BLOCKED_EXTERNAL, low urgency |
Check suite waiting for a maintainer to approve the workflow run (action_required, the usual fork PR state) | classified BLOCKED_EXTERNAL, low urgency; the check never ran, so it is never counted as a failing check |
| Checks still running | WAITING |
| 7+ days of silence with no approval | STALE |
Score is clamped to 0-100. Categories rank in this order: ACTION, BLOCKED_EXTERNAL, READY, WAITING, STALE. The report sorts by score, then category.
Two judgment calls worth knowing:
- External blockers are not failures. A preview deploy that fails because a maintainer has to authorize it is GitHub-marked "failure", but no code change fixes it. prwatch detects known patterns (authorization required, sign in to deploy, waiting on team approval) and files them as external, so they never inflate your urgency. The same applies to a check run that concluded
action_required: GitHub held the workflow for maintainer approval (the normal state of a fork PR), so the check never ran and carries no failure evidence at all, whatever its name or description says. - Thread resolution is approximated. The GitHub REST API cannot say whether a review thread is resolved, so top level review comments from non authors count as open threads. Comments that suggest a change (code suggestions, "please", "consider", "fix") count as actionable.
Development
npm install
npm test # tsx --test test/*.test.ts
npm run build # tsc, emits to dist/
npm run dev # run the CLI from source
Fixtures in test/fixtures/ are modeled on the real shapes of shadcn-labs/pdfcn PRs #92, #93, and #94 from 2026-10-13. Tests never touch the network.
License
MIT. Copyright (c) 2026 Rene Turcios. See LICENSE.
The toolkit
This tool is one of four in a lifecycle for open-source contribution work, all published under the @reneturcios npm scope and each available as a CLI and an MCP server (<tool> mcp):
- gatefile (
npx @reneturcios/gatefile) extracts a repo's contribution gates into a committedcontribution-gates.json. - greenlight (
npx @reneturcios/greenlight) pre-flights issues (GO / RISKY / TAKEN / GATED / STALE), consumes gatefile's output incheckandscan, then claims, preps, and opens PRs. - claimcheck (
npx @reneturcios/claimcheck) watches for stale claims and fixes parked on forks. - prwatch (
npx @reneturcios/prwatch) triages your open PRs by what needs you right now.
If prwatch saved you time, star this repo: it helps other developers find it.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to review this server!
More Developer Tools MCP Servers
Rea
Freeby Morluto · Developer Tools
Reverse engineer anything from your terminal or agent with one CLI and MCP server.
Paperclip
Freeby Paperclipai · Developer Tools
Trending hip-hop artist momentum scores across four cultural dimensions.
Fetch
Freeby Modelcontextprotocol · Developer Tools
Web content fetching and conversion for efficient LLM usage
Git
Freeby Modelcontextprotocol · Developer Tools
Read, search, and manipulate Git repositories programmatically
Toleno
Freeby Toleno · Developer Tools
Toleno Network MCP Server — Manage your Toleno mining account with Claude AI using natural language.
MCP Marketplace
Freeby mcp-marketplace · Developer Tools
Search and install MCP servers from inside your AI client.
